designing student
assessments
What is Component 1F?
Component 1F emphasizes the importance of rubrics, formative assessments, and summative assessments, and specifies the difference between the two types of assessments. This component also discusses different techniques that can be used in order to make assessments practical and accessible to all learners.
Why is Component 1F important?
Teachers must understand the difference between assessment of learning and assessment for learning, and be able to apply each skillfully. Assessments of learning show that students understand the material, and assessments for learning show that the teacher has effectively taught the material, and is able to adapt his lesson plan in order to ensure that all of his students are learning well. Both the teachers and the students must be able to use both types of assessments, on themselves, and on the opposite category.
What are the elements of Component 1F?
The first element of Component 1F is Congruence with Instructional Outcomes. This states that all assessments must be adapted for use by every learner, and must fit with state and curricular standards.
The second element of Component 1F is Criteria and Standards. This emphasizes the importance of specific expectations, which students contribute to, for ease of memory and learning, as acceptable.
The third element of Component 1F is Design of Formative Assessment. This element specifies that the teacher needs to be able to create assessments for learning as he is teaching so that he will be able to adapt the lesson to reach all learners.
The final element of Component 1F is Use for Planning. The teacher must be able to use the results from the assessments in order to enhance his teaching skills and style.
What are some artifacts displaying Component 1F?
Some possible artifacts that would display student assessments include a lesson plan with assessments that are directly linked to state standards, rubrics used for grading student work, and technology tools used to create assessments.
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice a framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Component 1F emphasizes the importance of rubrics, formative assessments, and summative assessments, and specifies the difference between the two types of assessments. This component also discusses different techniques that can be used in order to make assessments practical and accessible to all learners.
Why is Component 1F important?
Teachers must understand the difference between assessment of learning and assessment for learning, and be able to apply each skillfully. Assessments of learning show that students understand the material, and assessments for learning show that the teacher has effectively taught the material, and is able to adapt his lesson plan in order to ensure that all of his students are learning well. Both the teachers and the students must be able to use both types of assessments, on themselves, and on the opposite category.
What are the elements of Component 1F?
The first element of Component 1F is Congruence with Instructional Outcomes. This states that all assessments must be adapted for use by every learner, and must fit with state and curricular standards.
The second element of Component 1F is Criteria and Standards. This emphasizes the importance of specific expectations, which students contribute to, for ease of memory and learning, as acceptable.
The third element of Component 1F is Design of Formative Assessment. This element specifies that the teacher needs to be able to create assessments for learning as he is teaching so that he will be able to adapt the lesson to reach all learners.
The final element of Component 1F is Use for Planning. The teacher must be able to use the results from the assessments in order to enhance his teaching skills and style.
What are some artifacts displaying Component 1F?
Some possible artifacts that would display student assessments include a lesson plan with assessments that are directly linked to state standards, rubrics used for grading student work, and technology tools used to create assessments.
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice a framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.